I was having a discussion the other day and told the other person that I did not believe in the bible. She then proceeded to try and use the bible to prove it was the word of God because it says so. As far as I can see, that's like if I wrote a book of fiction, and then said it was true in that book, people could try to use that part of the book to prove it was true, because the book says so... does this make sense at all? It seems to be curcular thinking to me.
Asked by Anonymous at 9:55 AM on Jan. 26, 2009 in Religion & Beliefs
Answer by Laura1229 at 10:33 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by Wimsey at 9:57 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by samurai_chica at 10:28 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by caitxrawks at 10:39 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by samurai_chica at 10:46 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 10:54 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by samurai_chica at 11:11 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
I don't believe in it, it was written and rewritten gadzillions of times by humans, plus I hear or read that different people, different sects (don't know what other word to find for it) say that everyone else "interprets" the bible wrong, and they got it right, I mean, if there is a need for interpretation of bible how much exactly is the truth, to me nothing, nic, nada, zilch, whatever language you can use, bologna, bs, etc etc. To me it is all just a stack of legends put together by people with zero knowledge of science, biology, medicine etc etc. ages agoand we the modern people with all the knowledge of the world and universe that we have acquired so far,still "believe" in them??????????????????? Give me a break.
Answer by BeaMoore at 11:13 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by jenettyshome at 11:22 AM on Jan. 26, 2009
Answer by MamaK88 at 11:29 AM on Jan. 26, 2009