Answers Ask a Question
- New & Interesting
-
Parenting Questions
- • General Parenting
- • Babies
- • Toddlers
- • Preschoolers
- • School-Age Kids
- • Tweens
- • Teens
- • Adult Kids
-
Life & Home Questions
- • Beauty & Style
- • Buying a Home
- • Diet & Fitness
- • Entertainment
- • Food & Drink
- • Health
- • Hobbies & Crafts
- • Holidays
- • Home & Garden
- • Military
- • Money & Work
- • Pets
- • Relationships
- • Religion & Beliefs
- • Shopping
- • Technology
- • Travel
- • About CafeMom
- Debate Questions
- Fun and Games
-
Encyclopedia
- • Parenting
- • Life & Home
- • All Topics
Religious Apartheid?
I tried to copy her article to post here, but I can't. You'll have to click on the link to read it. Sorry.
Answer Question- SHARE THIS QUESTION:
-
-
From what I see, it's a self imposed Apartheid. I think the language of non believes is inflammatory (deliberately so) and antagonistic. As the writer's article clearly illustrates.Found an answer to your question?
Like us on Facebook! -
I didn't self-impose the bible-based bills that are being proposed and passed. We have a strange trend going on in our government that is leaning toward religiously based laws. It's clear from the surge of moral legislation that's being proposed in practically every state in this country. She, at least, offers a solution - for people to use their right to vote to change the direction of what she considers religious apartheid. I can't argue that.
Comment by jsbenkert (original poster) at 10:49 AM on Apr. 30, 2012
Credits: 87630 Level 37
Religious Debate Degree
-
How do you know if they are bible-based have you read the bills yourself and have your read the Bible to see that both the bill and the bible coincide together.
Found an answer to your question?
Answer by Anonymous at 10:57 AM on Apr. 30, 2012
Like us on Facebook! -
No, the trend is not leaning that way. Not Federally.
No one is debating her right to vote anyway she chooses. But here perception of what is happening isn't necessarily what is really happeningFound an answer to your question?
Like us on Facebook! -
" She, at least, offers a solution - for people to use their right to vote to change the direction of what she considers religious apartheid. I can't argue that."
Sure, but then you would also have to respect those that use their moral values (even those based on religion) to vote to have those values condoned by the state.
Can't argue with that
SharonFound an answer to your question?
Answer by momto2boys973 at 11:18 AM on Apr. 30, 2012
Credits: 84979 Level 36
Religious Debate Degree
Like us on Facebook! -
Interesting answer Sharon.Found an answer to your question?
Like us on Facebook! -
We've always had whackadoo proposed laws. I don't think the amount has increased as much as the coverage of the proposed laws has. This is a culture of shock and awe, propagandized drama. Over 10,000 bills are proposed Federally each year. A good portion are extremist whackadoo special interest bills.
Alarmists abound on all sidesFound an answer to your question?
Like us on Facebook! -
Alarmists abound on all sides
So you'll be voting no on the Colorado marriage amendment?Found an answer to your question?
Like us on Facebook!
Next question in Religious Debate
This author asks:
Next question overall
(Toddlers (1-2))
What are some ways i can discipline my 15 month old? She pinches and bites...
Recently Bumped in Debate
A&F - they hate more than just fat girls
Check out these Tasty Treats from The Stir's partners: