Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Isn't everything Obama says BIASED to his own agenda?

He has NO FACTS to support his spewing that spending all this money will solve our problems. But so many liberals follow him blindly.
People post political and Current Event Articles. Some news, some editorials. Why does it matter?
You know in the REAL WORLD, people have opinions about EVERYTHING, not just news stories.
Why are there moms on here that dispute articles because they are editorial. Are people not allowed to have opinions because you said so?
Did you set the rules of cafe mom and fail to make everyone aware? How shallow and narrow minded that you won't discuss current event editorials?

 
Anonymous

Asked by Anonymous at 11:03 AM on Feb. 12, 2009 in Politics & Current Events

This question is closed.
Answers (20)
  • Of course he is. He has to pay back those who got him the White House. He has to look towards the next election. He will make more money on speaking engagements when he is out of office if he is in the White House for 8 years. For Obama this is about money for him and his family. He has only his and his families best interests at heart. So if he puts the country in the shitter he doesn't care he will still be rich.

    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 12:39 PM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • Isn't anything anybody says biased to their own agenda?
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 11:05 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • The People who use "it's not a reliable source" as an argument are avoiding a debate they cannot win.
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 11:06 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • no but i'm pretty sure this "question" is biased AND it has it's own agenda.
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 11:06 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • If someone posts a blog or commentary as FACT, I will dispute that.
    But editorials are open for discussion and free game. It helps to get people thinking. If someone has an issue with the Source, then they should dispute the editorial with facts to validate it's lack of reliability.
    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 11:10 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • Ohh and yes. Obama has NO PROOF nor gurantee that this massive spendulus-maximus plan will work.
    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 11:13 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • Carolina, is that you by any chance?
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 11:14 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • Blogs are opinions and sometimes not based on fact. Facts are facts though. The more Obama does the more fact is going to be there that he is on his own agenda and that he is trying to repay the favors that got him elected. History is written by every decision and thing he does, as with every other president in history.
    gemgem

    Answer by gemgem at 11:15 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • I disagree with your blanket statement that he has no facts. Of course he has facts. I disagreed with W, and he had facts. And of course he is biased to the plan, his administration built it. Every administration is biased to their own agenda (see Iraq, and Iran for instance).

    Did you just want to be mad about it, or did you have facts to add?
    Fiveofakind2

    Answer by Fiveofakind2 at 11:20 AM on Feb. 12, 2009

  • We followed Bush blindly into war.
    So at this point people are willing to put their faith into anything.
    Can you blame them? Well it seems that you are.
    Everyone has opinions and are allowed to state it.
    Some moms are more passionate than others.
    Just because another mom is passionate in her
    political beliefs; it doesn't take away from you and your
    beliefs. We all live in different parts of the country and
    have very different experiences and therefore
    very different views. We should all respect each
    others views though because we are all mommys
    sharing common struggles.
    =]
    bronxcouture

    Answer by bronxcouture at 11:29 AM on Feb. 12, 2009