Wednesday, February 11, 2009
A big share of the financial burden of raising Nadya Suleman's 14 children could fall on the shoulders of California's taxpayers, compounding the public furor in a state already billions of dollars in the red.
Asked by Anonymous at 12:08 PM on Feb. 12, 2009 in Politics & Current Events
Answer by NewMommyin06 at 12:11 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
Answer by boy_or_girl at 12:13 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
Answer by boy_or_girl at 12:16 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
I think California has a right to be concerned if she needs taxpayers money. I think the US taxpayers have a right be concerned as well. If CA is seeks a Federal Bailout~ California's financial burden's very well may become the Nations burden.
One should not CHOOSE to have children if one cannot take full RESPONSIBILITY [including full financial responsibility] for taking care of all of them. jmo.
If she doesn't need government assistance, then no worries, her business, her responsibility.
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:22 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
Answer by Ginger0104 at 12:31 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
Answer by Scorpio359 at 12:33 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:34 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:35 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
They should care. She's ripping off the system now with the disability claim on her child with ADHD and one with a delayed speech and slight symptoms of autism. Of course the government is stupid for paying that. My daughter has ADHD and I don't get money for her. I wouldn't want it anyway. She's using the system as much as possible and has no grip on reality. She says she wants to continue her work on her master's degree and support the kids on student loans. Wth? How on earth is she going to study while taking care of all those kids? She said she'd rely on the school daycare and volunteers to watch her kids while she attends classes. That doesn't sound like a person willing to take care of and love her children.
Answer by Anonymous at 12:37 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
The problem that I see with this is that other women are going to do or are doing the same thing. Not just in California but in other states. Then you have a bunch of women living off PA at the taxpayer’s expense. In other words having their cake and eating it too.
Answer by Anonymous at 12:40 PM on Feb. 12, 2009
Featured Posts in All Groups