The SCOTUS originally ruled 2 years ago that it wasn't legal. Then yesterday, a federal judge ruled it's ok as far as she's concerned, as long as they're doing it to track you someplace they think you're going to show up anyway. How does that loophole sit with you?Answer Question
Answer by MooNFaeRie30 at 6:04 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
I would think it would require a court order. Kinda like the ankle bracelet they give to parolees.
Answer by mrsmom110 at 6:24 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Answer by winterglow at 7:07 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Answer by fiatpax at 7:14 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Answer by PartyGalAnne at 7:51 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Answer by tessiedawg at 8:14 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
No, they shouldn't. Only with a warrant. I'm not one bit surprised though. Eric Holder gave this administration permission to create and store dossiers on innocent Americans. I'm not quite sure why they would feel the need to do so. If they have cause, then I suppose I would feel much more comfortable with a judge having to give permission.
I asked a question about this the other day and only got 3 answers. I guess nobody cares if their government can spy on them without reason or cause. Very sad.
Answer by QuinnMae at 9:29 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Answer by LostSoul88 at 9:34 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Here is the link for the article I referenced: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/12/gov-dossiers-on-us-citizens/
In a secret government agreement granted without approval or debate from lawmakers, the U.S. attorney general recently gave the National Counterterrorism Center sweeping new powers to store dossiers on U.S. citizens, even if they are not suspected of a crime, according to a news report.
Answer by QuinnMae at 10:05 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Answer by m-avi at 10:35 AM on Dec. 21, 2012
Check out some of the top posts today in Groups: