A friend posted this:
"If Hobby Lobby can opt out of birth control being supplied by its insurance company because of its religious beliefs, then a Scientologist employer can deny psychological coverage, Jehovah's Witness can deny covering blood transfusions, a Mormon can refuse to cover any medicine that uses alcohol. Just because you employ a person does not mean you have the right to make medical decisions for them."
What do you think? Should an employer have the right to make these decisions, based on their own personal beliefs about god and medicine? Should an employer who believes only in natural, homeopathic cures be able to deny his employees traditional medical coverage?Answer Question
Answer by lawla at 10:28 AM on Feb. 19, 2013
Answer by Anna92464 at 12:34 AM on Jan. 28, 2013
Answer by emptynstr at 3:49 PM on Jan. 7, 2013
Answer by SabrinaMBowen at 9:27 PM on Jan. 5, 2013
Answer by soyousay at 11:40 AM on Jan. 4, 2013
i love this comic...cept this time its not the GOP but rather companies.
Answer by okmanders at 2:36 PM on Jan. 3, 2013
Answer by bandgeek521 at 2:19 PM on Jan. 3, 2013
Answer by butterflyblue19 at 2:00 PM on Jan. 3, 2013
Answer by NannyB. at 1:26 PM on Jan. 3, 2013
Answer by Anonymous at 1:11 PM on Jan. 3, 2013
Next question overall
My ebf 4 mnth old is fussy at the breast the last few days. She had a large...
Recently Bumped in Debate
Do you feel it's better to have "Faith" than no faith at all?
Check out some of the top posts today in Groups: