Russia certainly has a colorful history, doesn't it?
It has made so many drastic changes in the past two centuries, some promising, some dangerous.
We had hopes at one time that we would see a more democratic nation that gave more freedoms to the people, but what we've been seeing is a far cry from that. Here's the latest installment in Russia's strive toward anachronism: http://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2013/01/putins-privileging-of-the-orthodox-church-in-russia-may-go-too-far-even-for-the-patriarch
Posted: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:37
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a new bill into law that makes religious education mandatory for all schools in the country.
The legislation concerns a course on the fundamentals of religion that will be taught at all schools, the Moscow Times reported, although it did not specify which religions will be discussed in classrooms. The law was approved by the Federation Council on 26 December 2012, and will go into effect on 1 Sept 2013.
Putin, an Orthodox Christian, has been privileging the Russian Orthodox Church, the dominant religion in the country. The Church's leading bishop, Kirill I of Moscow, has often acted as adviser to the president, although that has also sparked some dissatisfaction among Russians who insist that church and state should remain separate.
A protest on this issue by the punk band Pussy Riot in February last year in Moscow's main cathedral led to two members of the band being imprisoned for offending religious feelings. This has led to the pro-Kremlin United Russia party to propose a new law with even more severe punishments for offending religious sentiments.
The proposals have even alarmed Bishop Kirill who welcomed the jailing of Pussy Riot, and he has asked the Kremlin not to go too far.
In remarks published on the eve of Russian Orthodox Christmas, Kirill, who has likened Putin's long rule to a "miracle of God", told the Interfax news agency that Russia needed stiffer punishments for offences against religion.
"A fine of several hundred roubles (about $10) for blasphemous inscriptions on a church, a mosque or a synagogue signals that society does not fully realize the importance of protecting ... religious feelings of believers," he said.
But in his most extensive comment on the proposed law, he said it should not limit citizens' rights.
"Any regulatory acts regarding the protection of religious symbols and the feelings of believers should be scrupulously worked through so that they are not used for improvised limitation of freedom of speech and creative self-expression."
The remarks were in line with indications that Putin, while wanting to make clear that actions such as the Pussy Riot protest are unacceptable, is wary of undermining the balance between religions in the diverse country.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Do you think that this is a positive step (clearly, I don't)?
Do you think that "religious feelings" need protection?
Answer by Ballad at 2:53 AM on Jan. 10, 2013
Answer by NotPanicking at 2:16 AM on Jan. 10, 2013
Answer by Ballad at 12:38 AM on Jan. 10, 2013
Answer by Dardenella at 12:14 AM on Jan. 10, 2013
Answer by NotPanicking at 10:22 PM on Jan. 9, 2013
Answer by skinnyslokita at 10:06 PM on Jan. 9, 2013
I have been following the news about the band that was arrested. Most of them (if not all) are moms. They requested that they stay at the prison in Moscow so that their children could visit them. They were shipped off to Siberia. And to answer your question, no I don't think it is a positive step. I don't think religious feelings need protection. I do think the freedom to practice a religion or not practice one needs to be protected, however, that is how Russia does things. We may say that the US is going to shit but if you look at the overall picture, Americans have it made.
Answer by JeremysMom at 9:58 PM on Jan. 9, 2013
Check out some of the top posts today in Groups: