Gun control can mean a variety of things to different people. So what is gun control to you. Do you want everyone not to have guns? Do you feel its only the guns that shoot multiple ammunition. I think they keep on saying they are assault weapons but regular rifles I think can be turned into that so that is why I put forth the question.
I believe in the right to bear arms. I grew up around guns and have gone shooting when I was younger and I hope to take a safety class real soon.
I think gun control is being miss interpreted by some so please response in your view of "gun control"
Answer by Dardenella at 3:07 PM on Jan. 21, 2013Credits: 198920 Level 45 Politics & Current Events Degree
Answer by QuinnMae at 10:45 AM on Jan. 21, 2013Credits: 235606 Level 46 Politics & Current Events Degree
Answer by anime_mom619 at 1:42 PM on Jan. 20, 2013Credits: 70747 Level 35 Politics & Current Events Major
Answer by Michigan-Mom74 at 12:20 AM on Jan. 20, 2013Credits: 57466 Level 33 Politics & Current Events Degree
"To me is putting a ban on mass destruction weapons and regulate who gets a gun period..."Older
When I think of WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION I do NOT think guns., I think nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, biological weapons. Why do you even think to put firearms in the same category as WMD? Doesn't matter how you word it as you put it older, its still WMD. And to me it tell me you are simply uneducated about firearms.
Does that look like like fucking gun to you?
A muzzle blast?
Answer by Michigan-Mom74 at 12:01 AM on Jan. 20, 2013Credits: 57466 Level 33 Politics & Current Events Degree
Answer by Sierrarose99 at 11:02 PM on Jan. 19, 2013Credits: 550 Level 11
Answer by booklover545 at 9:17 PM on Jan. 19, 2013Credits: 104687 Level 38 Politics & Current Events Major
Answer by okmanders at 8:44 PM on Jan. 19, 2013Credits: 135684 Level 41 Politics & Current Events Degree
This is the problem the government is way too big. Right now it is the government wanting to take what they call "assault rifles" but we do know there are people in office who would like to remove all guns. What is going to stop them in the future when a precedent is already set to take some of the guns away. The federal government is suppose to protect out country NOT to make laws that is the responsibility of the states. Who is to say that the next person in office comes along and takes all guns away. It is NOT going to solve anything other than to disarm the people and to keep them from defending themseleves against a corrupt government.
Answer by Anonymous at 7:52 PM on Jan. 19, 2013
Answer by NotPanicking at 6:31 PM on Jan. 19, 2013Credits: 336234 Level 49 Politics & Current Events Degree
Next question overall
(Just for Fun)
Tired of the men in your life leaving the toilet seat up? Try this.
Recently Bumped in Debate
Have you seen the video of the woman who found her dog in the debris?