An interesting (and tragic) turn of events.
So, if a fetus is a person, then the hospital is responsible for the death of two. If a fetus is not a person, thus absolving the hospital of responsibility of the deaths, then the Church needs to get off its compulsion to regulate all things having to do with female reproductive rights, and let women make these decisions for themselves. They can't have it both ways.
Thoughts?
Answer QuestionGood point, Nimue. They could still save face, though, by saying that they are only obliged to follow the law (but that would be hypocrisy, too, considering their obstructionist threats against the health-care laws regarding providing contraceptive coverage) as it is written, even if they consider the fetus to be a person.
Let me add, too, that I am staunchly pro-choice, but only to the point of fetal viability. If the fetus is capable of surviving outside the womb (as it would be at seven months), there is no reason not to remove it from the uterus and transfer it to NICU. These fetuses could have been saved, according to the story, so it would seem that the hospital is culpable in the deaths of not just one, but three lives.
Comment by jsbenkert (original poster) at 1:59 PM on Jan. 24, 2013
Credits: 87630 Level 37


Religious Debate Degree
Answer by Anonymous at 4:53 PM on Jan. 24, 2013
Next question in Religious Debate
Will there be a backlash?
Next question overall
(Kids' Health)
Block feeding ..breast feeding question ..
Recently Bumped in Debate
Would you ever leave your young child outside alone?