This is the ongoing saga of someone I went to school with who has a teenage daughter. Daughter got in trouble for texting at school, all well and good, everyone agrees, bad thing, don't do it, take your detention. Here's the conflict - the dean of her school has decided the punishment ongoing is that she is not allowed to be in possession of her phone on school grounds, ever. Not at lunch, not before school, never. Any time she is caught with a phone in her hand, even if it's not on, she is disciplined, to the point where it's reached suspensions.
Here's her mom's view - the school regularly goes on lockdown. Not just due to sensationalist stuff like bomb threats, but due to the typical drug dealer/gangbanger type stuff that shows up at any school in a metro area these days. It has resulted in things like some schools being evacuated while others are on lock-down, and parents not being able to pin down where each of their kids are, or make arrangements for the high school age ones to watch the little ones.
If the phone is not on (at one point they suspended her for having a phone in her purse with a dead battery), should the school still have grounds to discipline for being in possession of it?
ETA: everyone seems focused on the rule breaking and ignoring what the rule actually is, which is the point of the question - is it a good idea to have that kind of rule to begin with, whether it's broken or not?Answer Question
Answer by Anonymous at 6:09 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Answer by Anonymous at 5:18 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
IF she continually violated her school's policy for cell phone use, then I'm sure it's written into their policy/procedures that at some point they lose the "privilege" of having their phone on school grounds. If there was a true emergency, she could use the school phone or a classmate's.
Answer by mrsmom110 at 5:10 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Answer by Anonymous at 5:13 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Answer by m-avi at 5:20 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
The school has a rule of no cell phones. The girl broke the rule so now she can not be trusted. Whether it is in her hand or dead in her purse, she broke the rule so now she is paying the consequence for it.
Answer by JeremysMom at 5:27 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Answer by But_Mommie at 5:37 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Answer by Nos4 at 6:09 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Answer by Anonymous at 6:37 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Answer by But_Mommie at 5:14 PM on Feb. 15, 2013
Next question overall
(Home & Garden)
Where can a disabled person whom is trying to get out of an abusive marriage...
Recently Bumped in Debate
41 million still uninsured, 3.8 million insured who weren't before
Posts with Most Replies