Need to keep an eye on this one. The Sikh religion, in addition to mandating harm to no creature, also mandates that its members must be fully prepared to defend themselves and others from harm at any time. The lawsuit says CA's overly restrictive gun laws (some of the worst in the country) prevent Sikh's from free exercise of their faith.
When the defense isn't allowed to haggle over the finer points of the 2nd amendment, and must instead address the first, how will they fight this one? (especially keeping in mind the massacre at a Sikh temple last year by racist assholes who thought they were Muslims)Answer Question
Answer by gdiamante at 3:59 PM on Mar. 17, 2013
Answer by Ballad at 4:19 PM on Mar. 17, 2013
Answer by Dardenella at 4:29 PM on Mar. 17, 2013
Answer by wendythewriter at 5:13 PM on Mar. 17, 2013
Answer by Anonymous at 5:56 PM on Mar. 17, 2013
Answer by PMSMom10 at 12:19 AM on Mar. 18, 2013
Answer by okmanders at 12:25 AM on Mar. 18, 2013
Recently Bumped in Debate
Proposed amendment legally requiring businesses to openly display their...