Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

5 Bumps

Michigan mother wants to ban Anne Frank because it's "pornographic"

Imagine my shock when I clicked the link on Twitter and it did NOT go to The Onion...

Full disclosure - I have not read the unedited version of the diary that wasn't published until after her father died.  Even still, based on the section quoted in the article, that's no more graphic than the basic biology that should also be in the 7th grader's science textbook.

Is the Diary of Anne Frank too racy for precious little jr high snowflakes?

Answer Question

Asked by NotPanicking at 12:46 PM on Apr. 29, 2013 in Politics & Current Events

Level 51 (421,174 Credits)
Answers (32)
  • I can see a room full of 12 year olds reading this out loud

    Where are these schools where 6th and 7th graders still sit around reading aloud like they did in 1st grade? When it's a play, sure, but reading for a book report - they do that on their own time.

    Comment by NotPanicking (original poster) at 8:55 PM on May. 1, 2013

  • I can see a room full of 12 year olds reading this out loud and being very uncomfortable. A lot of what the kids read in middle school is complete crap focused on suicide, runaways, rape, etc. Too much shock value. Use the older version. If the kids want to read the new edition on their own that is fine. Pornographic isn't the right word, but it could create a hostile environment. bullying, harassment, etc. Not a responsible choice by the teachers/administrators.

    Answer by LoveMyDog at 8:28 PM on May. 1, 2013

  • It's basic anatomy, that's all.

    The mother clearly has hangups about her body and sex and has transferred them to her daughter. Want to be that she's never touched on sex ed with her daughter? Want to bet that the discomfort at the words used stems from never having used the correct terms for body parts? That she refers to her "lady parts" or her "vay-jay-jay" or her "girly bits"?

    Pornographic? Gimme a break ...

    Answer by winterglow at 4:07 AM on Apr. 30, 2013

  • I can see why that passage or ones like it could make come parents uncomfortable. I would think it could make some teachers uncomfortable as well...My thought is this: Even though I would not be upset if my 12-13 year old child read it. There is also this, the passages like that one are irrelevant to the reason the kids are reading the book in the first place I see no harm in going back to the original print that does not include them.

    Answer by But_Mommie at 5:06 PM on Apr. 29, 2013

  • Say what you will about me (and I'm sure you will...), but I'm going to lean against the CM masses on this one. When I read the passage that is being talked about, my eyebrows definitely raised. I think if DD wants to read the book or if her school has it as a reading assignment, I would make sure she got the old version.

    Answer by AllAboutKeeley at 4:05 PM on Apr. 29, 2013

  • I can see One Million Assholes getting behind this goddamned stupidity...

    Answer by Nos4 at 3:28 PM on Apr. 29, 2013

  • lost- that's not the one I read in school! lol

    Answer by josiesmommy00 at 2:27 PM on Apr. 29, 2013

  • " Now they will get the AFA and One Million Moms behind it. "

    if i was that mom id drop the whole thing the moment i found out those douchey groups were supporting me!!

    Answer by okmanders at 2:17 PM on Apr. 29, 2013

  • That's almost as ridiculous as One Million Moms bitching about the Geico commercials with the pig because it "promotes beasiality".

    Answer by maecntpntz219 at 2:12 PM on Apr. 29, 2013

  • " As for knowing how it looked, all you need is a mirror."

    Not necessarily true. I just went in the bathroom, got a mirror and a flashlight and can't see a lot of what was described. I can't imagine attic lighting being very good either.

    Answer by admckenzie at 2:10 PM on Apr. 29, 2013

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.