Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

OMFG... Talk about upping the threat level, and bringing yet more people over so they can put a greater strain on our govt programs...

.The Obama administration is considering resettling some refugees who have escaped war-torn Syria in the United States, a development first reported by the Los Angeles Times on Sunday and later confirmed by the State Department.

According to the Times, the resettlement of the refugees would be “part of an international effort that could bring thousands of Syrians to American cities and towns.”

A resettlement plan under discussion in Washington and other capitals is aimed at relieving pressure on Middle Eastern countries straining to support 1.6 million refugees, as well as assisting hard-hit Syrian families.

The State Department is “ready to consider the idea,” an official from the department said, if the administration receives a formal request from the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees, which is the usual procedure.

The United States usually accepts about half the refugees that the U.N. agency proposes for resettlement. California has historically taken the largest share, but Illinois, Florida, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia are also popular destinations.

UN, government and non-governmental representatives are meeting this week in Geneva to discuss the resettlement options, according to the Times.

 Though the refugee problem is a serious humanitarian issue – with most having fled to neighboring Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey – moving some of them to the U.S. would create challenges. First, how to vet applicants from a country where so many jihadi and al Qaeda activists are present. Secondly, would the lure of possible entry to the U.S. encourage other Syrians to leave their country, further straining their neighbors’ generosity and resources?

As the L.A. Times reports, “Two resettled Iraqis were convicted of trying to send arms to Al Qaeda from their home in Bowling Green, Ky.”

The paper describes political challenges as well:

Congress strongly resisted accepting Iraqi refugees, including interpreters who had worked with U.S. forces, after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. Most lawmakers share White House caution about getting more engaged in Syria and may have little appetite for a major influx.

But Susan Rice, President Obama’s new national security advisor, and Samantha Power, Obama’s nominee for U.S. ambassador to the U.N., both have been strong advocates for refugees. They may make the White House more receptive to at least a partial opening.

The L.A. Times points out that the Department of Homeland Security requires “careful vetting of refugees, with multiple interviews and background checks before they are allowed to enter the country.” That process, “under normal circumstances,” can take a year or more.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/11/obama-admin-considering-resettling-syrian-refugees-in-u-s-and-these-are-the-states-where-they-may-go/


 There is more at thisa link, these were the highlights. This is beyond stupidity.. How in the hell can the Obama Admin bring these folks over, and possibly get a few members of Al-Qaeda thrown in there for good measure?? And these people will put more strain on govt programs. And the worst part is that refugees may stay in the US indefinitely. They are provided with a pathway to citizenship and usually can apply within five years. Also, do people seriously believe these refugees will want to leave the US??  Not bloody likely 

Answer Question
 
Michigan-Mom74

Asked by Michigan-Mom74 at 4:46 AM on Jun. 15, 2013 in Politics & Current Events

Level 34 (66,351 Credits)
Answers (5)
  • I agree with you completely, my husband and I were talking about it earlier tonight.
    tntmom1027

    Answer by tntmom1027 at 4:55 AM on Jun. 15, 2013

  • By any means necessary. He doesn't care about the current system of things.
    QuinnMae

    Answer by QuinnMae at 11:08 AM on Jun. 15, 2013

  • It's troubling. I feel for the refugees, most of whom are probably just struggling people trying to get by. But we've got a lot of struggling people here already, and the terrorists aren't exactly novices at slipping through the cracks.
    Ballad

    Answer by Ballad at 4:38 PM on Jun. 15, 2013

  • America was built by immigrants and the land has a tradition going way back to being a place of refuge. I do not see them changing the tradition any time soon. I understand your concerns but also think that many of us would not be here if it weren't for the history of refuge. Our ancestors were refugees at one point. But I do agree, how will our economy support them when we're digging ourselves out of debt as well?
    hellokittykat

    Answer by hellokittykat at 6:08 PM on Jun. 15, 2013

  • Careful with what you say. They are watching.
    uwmilf

    Answer by uwmilf at 1:41 AM on Jun. 17, 2013

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.
close Cafemom Join now to connect to other members! Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN