Sure, we should limit the number of children people on welfare can have. But would you go for limiting the number of abortions the wealthy can have? Who are we to play God? Leave the octuplets' mom alone already!
Are the wealthy using taxpayer money to have an abortion?
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:30 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Answer by hypersquirrel at 12:32 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Answer by fluud7 at 12:32 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:33 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:35 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
I, personally don't think ANY taxpayer money should be used for ANY abortion beyond the scope of the Hyde Amendment.
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:35 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:36 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Octomom decided on being part of tabloids and society when she let her healthcare privacy make frontpage news. She could have refused to have any of her information given out, and sued when it was for privacy issues. She is fodder for whatever CafeMom or the media wants to pelt her way. I say go for it until those kids are in responsible homes with responsible parents. Her own family says she is nuts, if we leave her alone she'll have 8 more eggs implanted. She already has the room in there, did you see that heifer's gut? yuk.
Answer by akinbottom2 at 12:37 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:38 PM on Feb. 20, 2009
Answered at 11:36 AM on Feb. 20, 2009 by: Anonymous that's why you people have children that are sick. Since you wait until you are 50 to have children, and then you have to use IVF just like she did. Who's to know your embryos could multiply and you yourself could end up with 10 KIDS.
Answer by Anonymous at 12:41 PM on Feb. 20, 2009