Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

 
NotPanicking

Asked by NotPanicking at 11:22 AM on May. 9, 2014 in Politics & Current Events

Level 51 (420,431 Credits)
Answers (19)
  • I don't see the big deal about it. It wouldn't be much different from displaying OJ's glove. It's a historical relic of a trial that made history.
    anng.atlanta

    Answer by anng.atlanta at 11:30 AM on May. 9, 2014

  • I agree with anngatlanta.......
    older

    Answer by older at 11:36 AM on May. 9, 2014

  • I don't know that it makes a huge difference one way or the other, but there's been a push lately to have it put in. That's the most recent "news" link out there for it, but after they decided not to acquire it, people have been organizing and starting blog campaigns to have it added. I'm just wondering if it makes a difference if it's in there or not. If it's not, is it somehow negating his importance? If it is, is it making him a martyr?
    NotPanicking

    Comment by NotPanicking (original poster) at 11:37 AM on May. 9, 2014

  • I don't think any of it makes any difference, but to some it might make him a martyr!
    older

    Answer by older at 11:44 AM on May. 9, 2014

  • In my opinion, no.
    Dardenella

    Answer by Dardenella at 12:14 PM on May. 9, 2014

  • No
    momngram

    Answer by momngram at 1:03 PM on May. 9, 2014

  • No
    ladybugmamax2

    Answer by ladybugmamax2 at 1:03 PM on May. 9, 2014

  • No.
    baconbits

    Answer by baconbits at 1:19 PM on May. 9, 2014

  • No
    funlovinlady

    Answer by funlovinlady at 1:49 PM on May. 9, 2014

  • No.
    Rosehawk

    Answer by Rosehawk at 2:27 PM on May. 9, 2014

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.
close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN