Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Octuplet MOM (CNN)

Why are so many people concernd about how she's doing with her children? I understand the way she had her children not many people agree with but just because single mothers fall on hard times doesnt mean that shes a bad parent. You can tell that she really loves her kids and she has done a great job so far as a single mother with her first six. What happend to back in the day when mothers had 15-18 kids and it was normal? Back then not all people had alot of money but they seem to had done ok with a large family to take care of. You can't hate someone for wanting a big family. The Angalina look-alike is a whole nother story..lol



I would love for everyone to share there oppinon

Answer Question
 
maleek_1007

Asked by maleek_1007 at 3:13 PM on Feb. 25, 2009 in Politics & Current Events

Level 1 (0 Credits)
Answers (17)
  • I think im sick and tired of hearing about her to be honest. Good for her she wanted a big family now she has it. I dont think what she did was wrong but i do think she should have thought about what she was actually doing. I understand she wanted a big family and thats fine i hope she can care for her children and love them and give them all the support they need in life. Im sure shes a good mom and will do whats best for her kids.
    as for her looking like angalina i could care less im sure shes not the only women out there and i really dont think she looks that much like her but whatever.
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 3:16 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • Back then there wasn't IVF, alowing someont to choose to have a lot of children and being dependent on Government money to succeed.
    Back then there wasn't Welfare and people weren't mandated to pay. People helped out a woman who had fallen on hard times, as a community. She does NOT classify as hard times, she classifies as a pathetic excuse for a parent who is dependent on her own parents and the government to fund CHOICES she made.
    grlygrlz2

    Answer by grlygrlz2 at 3:17 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • (you are gonna get a lot of ugly replies by the way)

    When you CHOOSE to have children, then you need to KNOW that you can provide everything that they need, mainly a house, food and love.

    Yes she does seem to love them, but babies need more than love. The house they live in is her mom and dads, it is in forclosure. She has NO JOB and no dh to support her and the kids financially. So she needs help from the gov. But even with all the help gov. will give her its not enough.

    She was irresponsible and her children will probably suffer for it.

    Back in the day, their were two parent families, mother and father (most of the time) who lived on a farm, no birth control or way to get any. The babies were all different ages and the older ones helped with younger ones. They were NOT all the same age. Llike her 8.

    And most were born healthy (of course not all) But when you have a birth with 8, you WILL have problems!
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 3:18 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • Falling on hard times AFTER you already have children is one thing, but intentionally having more children while unemployed and living with one's parents is unconscionable. I don't care if someone has 20 kids, as long as they can care for them on their own and not rely on government handouts to survive.

    Momtocccd

    Answer by Momtocccd at 3:18 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • It wouldn't be a problem if she did this all with having a job and not living off the gov't. I agree she has alot of love for her children, but having 14 with no job,income, or even a house to live in that isn't in foreclosure calls for concern from people.
    usmc0351wife

    Answer by usmc0351wife at 3:19 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • People always need something else to talk about then focus on the state of the country or their own lives. Thats why shes on the news. Shes a diversion from having to discus the hard things.
    gemgem

    Answer by gemgem at 3:20 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • gemgem How is she only diversion from real news? California tax payers are spending their money to take care of her and her kids.

    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 3:27 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • She now says she fears the hospital will keep her babies.


    http://www.charter.net/news/read.php?ps=1016&rip_id=%3CD96IKE8O0%40news.ap.org%3E&_LT=HOME_LARSDCCLM_UNEWS


     It might be a good idea....

    pagan_mama

    Answer by pagan_mama at 3:30 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • She's got the cart before the horse. No one would care if she wanted 14 kids if she wasn't bankrupting her parents, unemployed, and living on food stamps.

    I personally don't care that much about her, but if I lived in the bankrupt state of CA, I'd be pissed!
    lovinangels

    Answer by lovinangels at 3:31 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

  • the new story is that the hospital says it cant send them home with her, they dont see it as a fit setting for that many children, they just wont release them to her, they can live there! lol
    AmaliaD

    Answer by AmaliaD at 3:47 PM on Feb. 25, 2009

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.