taking from the ones with MORE money, to protect the ones with LESS money...hmm, sounds like a great story to me, what about you?
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 7:21 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
Answer by mum-to-be-at-18 at 7:22 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
And it isn't socialistic, because they had the option to agree to taking a pay cut or begin letting people go. If they didn't like the idea~they can look for another job. It's still a free market. It's socialistic when one (ie: government) takes from another WITHOUT any other options out there.
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 7:24 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 7:25 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
If they received a letter that the government was taking over business and everyone was mandated to take a pay cut and the orderly would be making the same That would be socialistic.
And yes, a slight majority of people voted for Obama's Socialistic style Change. That doesn't mean those of us who didn't vote for it should accept it. It's still the United States of America. We are still free to speak. :o)
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 7:43 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 8:30 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 8:31 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
ALL must participate No. They have the choice to quit. You can't quit your government.
NOPE just like they can leave, so can you.......
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 8:34 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 8:51 PM on Mar. 12, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 9:04 PM on Mar. 12, 2009