So if they are supposed to be fair and balanced,
Why are they admitting they are the voice of opposition to President Obama?
Is that fair and balanced? Does that take them out of the "news" game?
Asked by Anonymous at 8:20 PM on Mar. 24, 2009 in Politics & Current Events
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 8:28 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 8:31 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
Answer by Raintree at 8:35 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 8:37 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
ANON, according to the VP of FOX, their main focus is to OPPOSE him. That's NOT fair or balanced. You can twist everything that is said 27 different ways, but in the end thats ALL opinion...when do we just get the news, no left or right? They are claiming to be FAIR, then saying but we want to take him down.....
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 8:39 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
Answer by lisadallasr at 8:42 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
I will still take FOX over a newscaster that get a 'thrill up his leg' over the mere mention of Obama. That seems a little Elvis-ish to me. Chris Matthews, Olberman and Maddow act like little school girls when they talk of him. I am embarrassed for them.
Answer by Anonymous at 8:43 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
I feel like they all do that. Pat Buchanon STAYs on Racheal Maddow (not sure of sp) and morning Joe is a republican and his co-host is a democrat..and they have people from both sides ...
I love Olberman, but yea he is a Â total leftie. I know watching his show Im getting HIS opinion NOT the straight news
I watch CNN some
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 8:51 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 8:52 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
Answer by JackalsWife at 8:59 PM on Mar. 24, 2009
Check out some of the top posts today in Groups: