Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Is Cheney emboldening the enemy?

David Gewirtz | BIO
Editor-in-Chief, ZATZ Publishing

I am seriously concerned that our former Vice President may have gone off his meds.

During the post-9/11 years of the Bush administration, whenever anyone in the media or the loyal opposition spoke out against the administration’s policies, that person was immediately accused of emboldening the enemy.

The theory was that if Al Qaeda, or the Iraqis, or the Iranians knew that there was some disagreement among Americans, they’d feel safe in attacking us — perhaps even fighting us over here, instead of fighting us over there.

Answer Question

Asked by Friday at 6:49 PM on May. 12, 2009 in Politics & Current Events

Level 19 (7,317 Credits)
Answers (28)
  • Friday

    Answer by Friday at 6:52 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • Hiding out in his secret, undisclosed lair for nearly the entire duration, Vice President Cheney ran the country with an iron fist. Our enemies knew that if they attacked us, he’d put on his Darth Vader hat, and hunt them all down single-handedly.

    When anyone in America voiced opposition to the Cheney/Bush policies, retribution (or at least accusation) was swift. The opposition voice was accused of emboldening the enemy, and even of possible treasonous activities. Had someone ranted then, like Dick Cheney is whining and complaining about the Obama administration now, Mr. Cheney would have lost his mind.


    Answer by Friday at 6:53 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • We really don’t know what went on with Mr. Cheney while he was in his various undisclosed locations, but one imagines each one must have had, at the very least, a shooting range where he could keep his marksmanship up to par. One also imagines that his secret service protectors were some very, very jumpy dudes.

    But when the Bush administration left office, Cheney no longer had all the might of the U.S. government within the palm of his black-gloved hand.

    Now, Mr. Cheney is apparently lair-less. If he can’t oversee torture and mayhem, at least he can be out and about, keeping busy bad-mouthing the new president. He scowls and growls, he snipes about the current administration’s policies, and his regular television appearances remind us all why he makes such great theater.


    Answer by Friday at 6:53 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • He has freedom of speech, leave the man alone. Now, he is just a citizen with rights like everyone else.

    Answer by akinbottom2 at 6:53 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • Then you have to ask, “What are the boundaries of Mr. Cheney’s patriotism?” Could he possibly be putting what he thinks are the interests of the Republican party first, before the health, safety, and well-being of America as a whole?

    What makes me really worry about whether Dick’s got his meds mixed right is what he’s saying about Rush Limbaugh and Colin Powell. According to Mr. Cheney, Rush is better for the Republicans than Colin Powell.

    There’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that Rush Limbaugh is vastly more entertaining that Colin Powell. Mr. Powell rarely makes an outrageous, hateful, or unreservedly full-goose bozo statement and Mr. Limbaugh’s got a million of ‘em.


    Answer by Friday at 6:54 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • Look, I’m not trying to be partisan here. I voted for Ronald Reagan. Twice. And I think America truly needs the Republican party. There needs to be loyal opposition and the Dems (with the possible exception of President Obama himself) certainly haven’t shown they’ve got the stones to take on our own fancy-pants bankers, let alone evil-doing terrorists.

    But to be taken seriously, the Republicans can’t have total nutballs as their standard bearers. For all his faults (you know, decorated military hero and all that), Colin Powell might well be a better (if less amusing) voice for the Republicans than Mr. Limbaugh.

    And Dick knows that. He’s just still sore that Powell sided with Obama and not McCain in the last election. Mr. Cheney also can’t forgive the former Secretary of State for disagreeing with him over America’s foreign policy.


    Answer by Friday at 6:54 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • But since America needs the Republican party, we need the Republican party to be at least marginally sane. If every time we see a Republican and he’s spitting and swearing and got drool running down his red face, we’re going to think Republicans are more like the crazy old uncle we all have than the thoughtful leaders of a nation we all need.

    When it comes to our crazy old uncles, we’re not sure we want to let them go out in public, never mind run a country. Hmmm…maybe that’s Mr. Cheney legacy. Now that we’ve let our Dick hang out in public, maybe he’s simply going for the crazy old uncle vote.

    Or maybe he’s just off his meds. Again

    Answer by Friday at 6:55 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • He has freedom of speech, leave the man alone. Now, he is just a citizen with rights like everyone else.

    I agree but while Bush was in office Cheney accused anyone who dared disagree with him of emboldening the enemy. Why is it ok for him to do it when he blasted others?


    Answer by Friday at 6:56 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • Can someone please look at the Liberal Agenda and tell me who is crazy?




    Answer by mustbeGRACE at 7:04 PM on May. 12, 2009

  • He's out of office now, his freedom of speech is just like anyone else's, leave the man alone and get on with the present. All of this looking to the past just makes my neck hurt.

    Answer by akinbottom2 at 7:18 PM on May. 12, 2009

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.