HR 1444, even with the mandatory wording? It appears that the mandatory / required wording was removed from the GIVE Act, but strangely reappears in HR1444. I am interested in how many people actually support mandatory service, even by our elderly?
Answer by LoriKeet at 3:57 PM on May. 28, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 2:40 PM on May. 28, 2009
Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.
Can someone define mandatory service requirement?
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 2:48 PM on May. 28, 2009
LOL, grly. I feel like I am playing the shell game. It was originally in the GIVE Act and when the public caught wind of it, somehow it disappeared. Now it reappears in something else. Gotta keep our eyes on them like toddlers in a pool.
Answer by QuinnMae at 2:58 PM on May. 28, 2009
Answer by LoriKeet at 2:59 PM on May. 28, 2009
Answer by yourspecialkid at 3:10 PM on May. 28, 2009
No, won't participate, and millions of others won't be "mandatoried" into it, either.
People around here don't really get into having their lives decided for them.
Answer by mustbeGRACE at 3:15 PM on May. 28, 2009
Answer by LoriKeet at 3:15 PM on May. 28, 2009
Huh, where are all of the Obama supporters now? They usually come out in clusters to support volunteering. Weird.
Answer by Anonymous at 3:32 PM on May. 28, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 3:35 PM on May. 28, 2009
Next question overall
(Just for Fun)
Should publics schools discuss relationships, straight or gay?