Answer by Carpy at 10:25 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Answer by okmanders at 12:57 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Answer by sammiesmom2000 at 1:58 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Answer by Shaneagle777 at 2:08 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Answer by LiliM at 3:09 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Answer by JackalsWife at 8:55 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Answer by RhondaVeggie at 8:55 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Answer by Carpy at 9:21 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
Carpy's got it. It was based on credible intelligence both here and from our allies.
Answer by CooksWife at 9:55 AM on Jul. 5, 2009
I agree with Carpy on this one. While I have not enjoyed the 2 tours my husband has been sent on to Iraq. I do feel as if it was a much needed thing for us to do. And while Iraq was not completely invaded for the Al-Queda, there still were training camps all over Iraq for the Al-Queda. There also were high level insurgents hiding in Iraq. So not only were we able to take a horrible person out of office but we were also able to track down and capture large assets to the Al-Queda.
To be completely honest with you, Al-Queda is a group, not a country with borders. There are training camps and secret hideouts all over the Arab Nations and even in non-Arab Nations. This is a ideal we are fighting against not a country or government so while we also took out a crook and evil man in Iraq, being Iraq also helped us in our fight against Terrorism.
Answer by RavnJay at 9:55 AM on Jul. 5, 2009