Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Another Ethics complaint filed by a conservative group, unwarranted?

In the wake of Governor Palin stepping down from her job, new allegations have surfaced today in Alaska charging Palin with additional violations of the Alaska Executive Ethics Act.

Zane Henning -- a conservative government watchdog from the governor's hometown of Wasilla and an oilfield worker on Alaska's North Slope -- asserts in a letter to Alaska Attorney General Daniel S. Sullivan that Palin has "been charging and pocketing per diem to live in her home and has used the process for a personal gain since being elected."


The Washington Post first broke this story last September during the 2008 presidential race, but until now, no formal ethics charges have been brought on the matter in Alaska.



Answer Question
 
sweet-a-kins

Asked by sweet-a-kins at 9:09 AM on Jul. 7, 2009 in Politics & Current Events

Level 34 (67,502 Credits)
Answers (73)
  • In a detailed press release accompanying his complaint, Henning declared that:

    Palin's use of the per diem is in direct conflict with Section 39.52.120. (a) of the Alaska Executive Ethics Act....More than a thousand state employees commute from the Mat-Su Valley daily and none of them get to pocket free money.
    Henning noted that "the State of Alaska provides housing in Juneau for the Governor."

    If she chooses not to live there, Alaskans should not have to pay for it. I am requesting that you and the Personnel Board direct Governor Sarah Palin to reimburse the State of Alaska all per diem funds, plus interest, and a fine that are related to charges while staying in her Wasilla residence.
    Henning further argued that Alaska Statute 39.20.010 sets an "annual salary for the governor of $125,000."
    sweet-a-kins

    Answer by sweet-a-kins at 9:10 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • Sarah Palin has collected more than the amount established by law by cashing in her per diem checks. Alaska Statute 39.20.050 (Exclusive Compensation) states that the compensation fixed by law for the governor and lieutenant governor is in full for all services rendered by each of them in any official capacity or employment whatsoever during their respective terms of office. Per diem is therefore any added expenses incurred while in travel status, not when living in your own home.
    According to Henning:

    State travel regulations say that per diem can't be claimed when travel is less than 50 miles from a state employee's workplace. The IRS and state finance officer have already determined that the per diem is considered income. The governor's workplace in Anchorage is only a 45-mile commute from her Wasilla home.
    In February, Palin was required to pay back income taxes on thousands of dollars in expense money she received
    sweet-a-kins

    Answer by sweet-a-kins at 9:10 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • In February, Palin was required to pay back income taxes on thousands of dollars in expense money she received while living at her home overlooking Lake Lucille in Wasilla. Little more than two weeks ago she was forced to pay back the State of Alaska more than $8,100.00 for nine trips taken by her children that she had improperly charged as being part of official state business.

    Henning contends the per diem is another way for the Alaska governor to line her pockets at the state's expense:

    As a Wasilla resident I know that thousands of valley residents commute into Anchorage for work every day. They don't receive checks from their employers for sleeping at home. Governor Palin does. And it's wrong, not to mention unethical, for her to even submit these per diem claims. To me, this is a roundabout way for Palin to give herself a raise.
    "The Governor is quitting her job," said Henning,
    sweet-a-kins

    Answer by sweet-a-kins at 9:11 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • and to think! if McCain won, she would have been VICE PRESIDENT! That thought is scary.

    soonmommyof3

    Answer by soonmommyof3 at 9:15 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • Not nearly as scary as the one we got.
    Carpy

    Answer by Carpy at 9:18 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • Not nearly as scary as the one we got.


    Really? I don't remember Biden having to pay back the IRS...or having to pay back tax payer money that he used for his own personal gain...and I don't recall him being found guilty of abusing his power...

    sweet-a-kins

    Answer by sweet-a-kins at 9:20 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • Sweet-a-kins I would just ignore Carpy. She tends to take what anyone says and makes it personal or twists it around. I figure there would have been an McCain/ Palin lover that would take what I said personal... even though the facts that one of them are a bad person.


    Not nearly as scary as the one we got.


     


    Really? I don't remember Biden having to pay back the IRS...or having to pay back tax payer money that he used for his own personal gain...and I don't recall him being found guilty of abusing his power...

    soonmommyof3

    Answer by soonmommyof3 at 9:28 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • Scary is how obsessed you are with Palin. She never chose to run for President, she was chosen as a VP candidate. GET OVER HER ALREADY.
    There are beautiful successful women in this world, that OTHER women like whether you like it or not.
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 9:32 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • Biden hasn't had any power to abuse. He's an idiot. Making him the VP is the one sure way to ensure he is only around for 4 more years and he's GONE. Sometimes you have to promote someone to get rid of them.
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 9:34 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

  • haha! the last comment made me laugh.
    soonmommyof3

    Answer by soonmommyof3 at 9:35 AM on Jul. 7, 2009

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.