A snack maybe but not a lunch.. there is not that much there and they are not healthy.. for the price you pay for one ou can make your child a sandwich, fruit and something else and its healthier.. im not saying they are bad now and then but i wouldnt send it with my child as just a lunch.. anyone agree?Answer Question
Answer by tabbys4 at 9:17 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
my kids like the subs too, though I rarely buy them. They are good for certain circumstaces, but not as a regular substitute for a real lunch. Better than McDonald's though, IMO.
Answer by VeronicaLee at 9:29 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Answer by tyfry7496 at 9:31 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Answer by pagirl71 at 10:08 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Answer by 2cuteboysrmine at 10:11 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
I read in a news article of the 10 worse foods to consume that lunchables were listed as the #1 worse foods you could eat or feed your kids. High fat, sodium and preservatives & very little nutrition. I've never bought them & would never consider giving them to my kids.
Answer by Anonymous at 10:12 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Answer by Cavalrybaby02 at 11:13 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Answer by Nika75 at 11:16 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Answer by robinann5 at 11:33 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Answer by texasgurl33 at 11:41 AM on Jul. 7, 2009
Next question overall
(Politics & Current Events)
Another Ethics complaint filed by a conservative group, unwarranted?