IMO, they shouldn't. What do you guys think?
FYI, he's the player who fought and tortured dogs.
Asked by Anonymous at 5:52 PM on Jul. 27, 2009 in Politics & Current Events
Answer by ronjwake at 5:55 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Answer by toriandgrace at 5:55 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Answer by Yoshi_Yoshi at 5:56 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Answer by toriandgrace at 5:56 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Answer by Dom123123 at 5:57 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Answer by citymama707 at 6:01 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Answer by tnm786 at 6:09 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Just because he has be re-instated doesnt mean he will be playing in the NFL
But Vick’s issues are far from over and he needs a team to call his own. So far, the owners of the New York Giants, Jets and Dallas Cowboys have said they had no interest in the 29-year-old quarterback. Neither do the Falcons, who officially released Vick in June.
5 down 27 more to go..
Answer by PestPatti at 6:22 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Answer by mancosmomma at 7:27 PM on Jul. 27, 2009
Ya, ya, Vick did his time for his crime. No... he doesn't need to have his past haunt him and keep him from a job. Just not with our franchise! Bleh! I'm somewhat disappointed with the NFL right now. I'm not sure how I would react if the Bronco organization signed him. I know respect would surely be lost. I would only hope Bowlen and McD have as much class as I think they do!
Answer by Loryl at 7:56 PM on Jul. 27, 2009