Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Should the Catholic College Belmont Abbey college be forced to offer medical care against their teachings?

Or should the teachers find another job if they don't like it?

The president of a small Catholic college said Friday he would rather close the school's doors than violate the church's teachings on contraception should the college lose the latest battle involving health-insurance laws and religious freedom.
The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has determined that Belmont Abbey College violated discrimination laws because the school's employee health insurance plan does not cover contraception, according to a letter the EEOC sent to the school.

"I hope it would never get this far," college President William K. Thierfelder told The Washington Times, "but if it came down to it we would close the college before we ever provided that."

Answer Question
 
Anonymous

Asked by Anonymous at 1:41 PM on Aug. 30, 2009 in Religion & Beliefs

Answers (15)
  • The factual conclusion reached by the EEOC could be a precursor to the commission filing a federal discrimination lawsuit against the college.

    "By denying prescription contraceptive drugs, [the college] is discriminating based on gender because only females take oral prescription contraceptives," the EEOC wrote in a letter to the North Carolina college. "By denying coverage, men are not affected, only women."

    Mr. Thierfelder disputed that conclusion in a letter posted on the college's Web site: "Belmont Abbey College rejects the notion that by following the moral teachings of the Catholic Church we are discriminating against anyone.

    "We are simply and honestly exercising the freedom of religion that is protected by the Constitution," he wrote.

    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 1:42 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • In the highest profile case involving contraception coverage and Catholic institutions, California forced Catholic Charities to cover contraception as part of its employee health-insurance plan. The California Supreme Court ruled in 2004 that Catholic Charities was not a religious organization under state law, and therefore was required to provide contraception coverage under state law.

    The EEOC investigation into Belmont Abbey stems from changes the college made to its employee health-insurance plan nearly two years ago. The changes came after the school discovered its plan had inadvertently been covering abortions, prescription contraception and elective sterilization procedures.

    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 1:43 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • Mr. Thierfelder wrote at the time that "it is the clear, consistent, incontrovertible, public, official and authoritative teaching of the Roman Catholic Church that abortion, contraception and voluntary sterilization are actions which are intrinsically wrong and should not be undertaken because of their very nature."

    The college, which has about 1,500 students, no longer covers contraceptive services as part of its employee health coverage.

    "As a Roman Catholic institution, Belmont Abbey College is not able to and will not offer nor subsidize medical services that contradict the clear teaching of the Catholic Church," Mr. Thierfelder wrote in a letter explaining the changes.

    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 1:43 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • In response, eight current and former faculty members - six men and two women, according to Mr. Thierfelder - filed a complaint with the EEOC charging that the changes to the insurance benefits violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them based on religion or sex.

    The letter the EEOC sent to the school said the plan change resulted in discrimination based on sex, but found no discrimination based on religion. The letter called only the contraception change discriminatory; it did not mention the change in coverage for abortion or elective sterilization.

    A spokesman at the EEOC in Washington declined to comment Friday, saying that confidentiality laws prevent the agency even from confirming that a complaint has been received or an investigation was undertaken
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 1:44 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • The letter said the next step is for the college and those who filed the complaint to try to reach an agreement to settle their differences. That seems unlikely, given Mr. Thierfelder's language. If no agreement is reached, the EEOC could then file a federal lawsuit against the college.


    Catholic college faces lawsuit over contraceptives

    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 1:45 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • No, they shouldn't be forced. While I am not in agreement, I think employees knew this or did find out and it is a widely known fact that the Catholic religion is against contraceptives. If they didn't agree and contraceptives are that important to them, they shouldn't have taken the job.
    MommyLee08

    Answer by MommyLee08 at 1:53 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • I believe they have a right to do whatever they want to do, and they should not be forced to go against their religion. People can go somewhere else to get contraception.

    My hospital is catholic and they will give you the pill, but they won't give you IUD's; the doctors send referrals to another facility if the patients would like that option. It isn't a big deal.

    I can't see these Religious hospitals being forced to perform services that go against their beliefs.
    Cinnamon-mom

    Answer by Cinnamon-mom at 1:53 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • No, they shouldn't. This is still America and I agree if they lose their freedom to exercise their convictions, they should close their doors. There are plenty of other secular medical facilities women can go to for contraception.
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 2:17 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • Sorry but there are no "outs" for equal opportunity employment.
    Anonymous

    Answer by Anonymous at 2:28 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

  • Wow, this school is literally down the street from me and this has not been in the news locally whatsoever.......but michael jackson, "john and kate plus 8", and mike sanford have been all over it.....
    lucysmomrocks

    Answer by lucysmomrocks at 2:44 PM on Aug. 30, 2009

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.
close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN