Because they do, according to the New England Journal of Health.
Check it out here:
Answer by Anonymous at 10:48 AM on Sep. 15, 2009
Answer by NotPanicking at 10:50 AM on Sep. 15, 2009
Ya know, NPR is UBER LIBERAL.
"The AMA fears a public option eventually could lead to government putting more limits on doctors' fees."
So doctors who belong to the AMA are the ONLY "greedy" doctors?
The survey was published online Monday by the New England Journal of Medicine. It was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a health care research organization that favors health reform.
"The survey was published online Monday by the New England Journal of Medicine. It was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a health care research organization that favors health reform. "
No bias there. *sarcasm*
Answer by mancosmomma at 11:01 AM on Sep. 15, 2009
My grandpas Dr told HIM that he not only resigned from the AMA but that he sent them a notarized letter! ALL because of the stuff Obama is doing. He told my grandpa, who just got diagnosed with prostate cancer, that if any of the current plans went in my grandpa would NOT be treated. (another one of those stupid redneck conservatives I guess!). He ALSO said that many MANY dr he knew were getting out of the AMA!
Answer by momof030404 at 11:04 AM on Sep. 15, 2009
Answer by Lindalu2 at 11:05 AM on Sep. 15, 2009
The fact is, the New England Journal of Health only represents 17% of all practicing physicians in the US, so actually it would only be 2/3 of 17% of all physicians support it... that makes a big difference in numbers... another twisted statistic that is not correctly reported!!!
Common sense question: why would anyone be in support of something that is gonna put themselves out of business??? Common sense answer: the MAJORITY of US physicians who have even the slightest bit of common sense is NOT in favor of nobama's health care scam...
Answer by Anonymous at 11:10 AM on Sep. 15, 2009
Answer by lovinangels at 11:11 AM on Sep. 15, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 11:13 AM on Sep. 15, 2009