I love John Travolta..he seems like such a kind spirit...I don't understand why he didn't disclose this information while his son was still alive..I understand the need for privacy but I'm dissappointed in him~! He could have been an advocate for autism all along...he could have brought so much attention to it, done work to help fund research and bring attention to the cause like Jenny McCarthy has done...sorry, just needed to vent.
Answer by azaleasmom at 5:44 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 4:42 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
Answer by Carpy at 4:42 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
Answer by bebita at 4:48 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 4:54 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
You know I thought he was, but never really had the proof other than a gut wrenching feeling that he was a child who had autism.
Answer by Anonymous at 4:55 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
Answer by chocolatluver at 5:01 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 5:02 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
If he were going to advocate for autism the way Jenny McCarthy does, I'd rather he keep it to himself. That woman hasn't done me any favors. Now all I hear is, "why haven't you cured her yet, haven't you tried Jenny McCarthy's diet? Jenny McCarthy says you can cure autism, what are you doing wrong?" Sorry, my daughter actually has classical autism, and cannot be "cured". But back to the subject, it's none of our business. John and Kelly kept their kids out of the lime light as much as possible, and I think that's a great thing. I'm really surprised he said it at all, aren't they scientologists? I thought they didn't "believe" in autism?
Answer by syfymom at 5:05 PM on Sep. 24, 2009
Answer by chocolatluver at 5:14 PM on Sep. 24, 2009