think that all homo sapiens can understand how the mere thought of an organization that receives government money through contract mechanisms being tangentially involved in setting up a fake tax shelter for a fake pimp and his fake prostitution ring of fake prostitutes can justifiably lead to lawmakers going absolutely cross-eyed with white-hot, impotent rage. But what happens when a similarly taxpayer-endowed contractor attempts to cover up employee-on-employee gang rape by locking up the victim in a shipping container without food and water and threatening her with reprisals if she report the incident? Somehow, it doesn't engender the same level of anger!
Franken's amendment ended up passing, 68-30. Here's a list of the Senators who showed broad support for Roman Polanski by voting against it:
Answer by Lindalu2 at 5:57 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 5:38 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 5:39 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Ok.....really...ya need to post a link because I have NO IDEA what that rant was about. Be happy to respond when it makes sense. You usually are at least understandable but this one is just not all there. Link please...thank you. :)
Answer by momof030404 at 5:42 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Answer by lvpenguino at 5:42 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Answer by tnmomofive at 5:48 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Answer by lvpenguino at 5:52 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Why would the senate get together and have a VOTE on something that is a justice department issue. This still doesn't make sense.
Answer by momof030404 at 6:00 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Answer by lvpenguino at 6:03 PM on Oct. 7, 2009
Answer by mancosmomma at 6:09 PM on Oct. 7, 2009