I know that most of you don't like Fox news, but DH was looking at news this morning and I saw it there when I was passing by.
So, instead of the 40,000 troops that were asked for, is sending 13,000 better than nothing, or is it a bad move that will result in surrender?
Answer by ave.maria. at 11:02 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Answer by QuinnMae at 9:11 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Answer by LilCaprica at 9:19 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
I have a feeling some of you would rather read it here.
Answer by QuinnMae at 9:20 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Wasn't it during the campaign that BO admitted that the surge in Iraq worked better than expected...you know the one he voted against? Why in the hell is he not trying to do this in Afghanistan? He's not even listening to the generals that are there trying to win this thing. Oh wait, he's an idiot.
How many surprise visits has he made over there since taking office?
Answer by Anonymous at 9:23 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Answer by PsWifey at 9:32 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Thanks for posting a link to the whole article, so far I have only gotten bits and pieces and never an exact number Obama approved.
Answer by LilCaprica at 9:33 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Not second guessing, PsWifey, just asking a question. But thanks for inflecting your own assumptions about me. Careful, your bias is showing.
Answer by QuinnMae at 9:34 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Answer by tnmomofive at 9:35 AM on Oct. 13, 2009
Answer by Phase3 at 9:42 AM on Oct. 13, 2009