If you knew it was scientifically proven that one of the primary roles of hormonal birth control is to affect the uterine wall in a way that prevents a one-week old embryo from implanting, thus causing early abortion, would you still use it? Why or why not? And if so, explain why you wouldn't think of it as abortion.Answer Question
Asked by Anonymous at 11:25 PM on Oct. 23, 2009 in Religion & Beliefs
Answer by Ati_13 at 11:33 PM on Oct. 23, 2009
Answer by waterlily89 at 11:40 PM on Oct. 23, 2009
Answer by missbreezy214 at 11:41 PM on Oct. 23, 2009
Well, I'm pro-choice. But I don't use IUDs for this reason. They stop perfectly formed embryos from attaching to the wall of the uterus and cause early abortion. I can't use hormonal BC because I have hormonal issues and they make me hemorrhage. But in my opinion IUDs are abortion and I won't use them.
Hormonal BC on the other hand has 2 functions. The fist is to suppress ovulation. Although should something occur they are also supposed to force the body to refuse the implantation... But I still see them as a better choice.
Answer by SabrinaMBowen at 11:42 PM on Oct. 23, 2009
Answer by WindyTheWidow at 11:55 PM on Oct. 23, 2009
Answer by looovemybabies at 12:19 AM on Oct. 24, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 1:23 AM on Oct. 24, 2009
I'm against AFB for many reasons the main one is what it doing to the environment. Seeping into the ground waters and causing havoc on the wild life. Male fish that are sterile and so on. Much like the havoc that was caused by DDT and Trisodium Phosphate.
Answer by oldermomof5 at 7:51 AM on Oct. 24, 2009
Answer by Lexylex at 8:33 AM on Oct. 24, 2009
Answer by ave.maria. at 11:46 AM on Oct. 24, 2009