Wasn't there a CafeMom member in this situation recently?
Answer by gdiamante at 6:11 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Answer by outstandingLove at 6:15 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Answer by NightPhoenix at 6:23 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Answer by pnwmom at 6:28 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Answer by LoriKeet at 6:29 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 6:29 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
**responsibilities she obligated herself to the military **
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 6:30 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Answer by mancosmomma at 6:35 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Ok. I read the article it does not say how she got pregnant.....does it? It doesnt sound like she was raped. That means she had consensual sex and was either unprotected or protected and the BC failed, either way she knew pregnancy was a possibility and that she had no spouse or baby's father to take care of the baby WHEN she was deployed. She was not forced into the military, she joined of her own volition and knew the standards set when she joined. I dont understand how many of you who in a previous question believe that women should be able to serve equal with men are ok with this. The REST of her unit is counting on her to be there. They are now a man/woman down! This right here is why women have such difficulty being declared equal to men in battle zones. Why is she being "treated" badly? Because they are expecting her to honor her commitment?
Answer by momof030404 at 6:35 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
"Her civilian attorney, Rai Sue Sussman, said Monday that one of Hutchinson's superiors told her she would have to deploy anyway and place the child in foster care."
I would rather take a dishonorable discharge.
Answer by Gealach at 6:38 PM on Nov. 16, 2009
Next question overall
Exactly how accurate is the 14 day ovulation rule???