I'm asking because I'm trying to learn and expand my religious knowledge.Answer Question
Asked by Anonymous at 11:27 AM on Nov. 23, 2009 in Religion & Beliefs
Answer by Anonymous at 11:32 AM on Nov. 23, 2009
Answer by mompam at 11:37 AM on Nov. 23, 2009
Answer by Aasiyah at 11:41 AM on Nov. 23, 2009
Answer by IhartU at 11:57 AM on Nov. 23, 2009
Answer by BlessedMommy64 at 11:59 AM on Nov. 23, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:05 PM on Nov. 23, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:07 PM on Nov. 23, 2009
The fact is Anons, the more ancient text of the story would be more pure and unaltered, and so the Flood story of the Bible would be false and the Sumerian one true. Same thing with other stories contained in the Bible which have striking similarities to creation myths, prophets and even the story of Job in other, older cultures from the Middle East. Try doing a little research into when Genesis was written- there wasn't a transcriber in the freakin' Garden of Eden was there? You all act like the Bible is the most ancient manuscript around and it's NOT. Are you afraid to admit that maybe- just MAYBE the Bible and everything in it is nothing but a poor facsimile copied from other religions and myths?
Answer by IhartU at 12:45 PM on Nov. 23, 2009
He didn't! If there is any fact at all to the story, it is most likely that he only carried domestic livestock during a localised flood (albeit a bad one) but not global.
Answer by beeky at 12:48 PM on Nov. 23, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 12:58 PM on Nov. 23, 2009