This shows an email that was circulating a few years back comparing Al Gores home and that of (the evil, horriible, never does ANYTHING right) George W Bush. SHOCKINGLY Bush's house was the more enviromentaly sound. According to THIS the Gore home uses 12 times the electricity of a typical Nashville house!!
Now, with the Copenhagen confrence coming up and in light of the recent email scandel.....dont you think that BEFORE these people start voting in legislation that is going to make HUGE cost changes for and and BEFORE these people demand US to make changes to OUR Carbon foot print THEY should have to make changes to THEIR lifestyles???
Answer by momof030404 at 9:04 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 9:15 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
I think they should just scrap the whole thing. Al Gore is a money hungry ultra-liberal socialist. He owns the company that issues the carbon credits. He is making money faster than BO can print it. This is a huge financial wind fall for some and a huge financial disaster for us. I agree with the conservative directors in Hollywood. Gore needs to give back his Oscar he won for Inconvenient Truth. It was based on lies and he sold it as factual. At least that wacko, Michael Moore, had the sense to disclaim his "documentaries" as parody.
Answer by jesse123456 at 9:18 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
Answer by thundernlight at 9:41 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
George W Bush built that house prior to getting elected president. He has been living green for a long time. It's a shame no one appreciates that he walks the walk. Too bad All Gore and President Obama are all talk, no action. As someone who is concerned about the environment, I find it disgusting.
Answer by Anonymous at 9:51 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
Answer by tnmomofive at 9:57 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 10:31 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
Answer by thundernlight at 10:33 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
Answer by tnmomofive at 10:38 AM on Dec. 5, 2009
Answer by LoriKeet at 10:38 AM on Dec. 5, 2009