...for us to lactate, and to breastfeed (which is obviously the case, since we have breasts) is it then technically a sin for a woman who is fully functional to choose to formula feed?
since "God" provided us with the necessary equipment to sustain the life of our child once we birthed it, then is it not obscene to fashion false nipples with which to feed gods precious creation, "milk" that was not ever intended by design, for them to eat, because our sloth? (now go reference "sloth" in your bible... its a two for one sin!)
how is it obscene to feed a child with gods creation, as intended, but it is not obscene to wield false nipples attached to a vessel full of mans inferior creation?
(please keep swearing to a minimum- this is a RELIGIOUS question, NOT a ff vs BF debate)
Answer by Anonymous at 9:05 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
Answer by ptomom678 at 4:38 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
Answer by charlotsomtimes at 4:38 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
I will be the first to endorse BF but I think we are going a bit far by looking for sin in everything we do in life. I guess you could then turn around and say that a woman who had medical issues and is unable to BF is being punished by God or that a woman willing to expose herself to feed her child in public is a whore.
When you make every thing you do about sin it leads to more silly examples that just keeps reducing the number of people who are worthy of being christian.
This would explain why I started really leaning toward the pagans at least they dont go around trying to find sin and damnation in everything people do in their lives.
Answer by Anonymous at 4:40 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 4:43 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
Answer by zanzeebeel at 4:50 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
did you mean responses?
Answer by Anonymous at 4:51 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 4:56 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
Answer by Anonymous at 5:04 PM on Dec. 8, 2009
Answer by deadheadjen at 5:21 PM on Dec. 8, 2009