It's been all over the news, this one will vote yes, this one no. Do they have enough votes in the Senate? and on and on.... I don't know all the ins and outs of economics, I don't know enough about what he has or has not done. I have been thinking about it, but find myself confused on the whole thing. Can someone explain anything about it?
The other question with this is, if he does not get confirmation, who would or could be nominated in his place? Would that person be better or worse for the country?
Answer by waldorfmom at 11:22 PM on Jan. 24, 2010
Answer by rkoloms at 2:44 PM on Jan. 24, 2010
No. He is part of the machine that allowed the economic issues to compound. This position has way too much power anyway. It should be reviewed and redefined.
Answer by jesse123456 at 7:08 PM on Jan. 24, 2010
Answer by Carpy at 7:34 PM on Jan. 24, 2010
Answer by kittymommy at 8:54 PM on Jan. 24, 2010
Answer by waldorfmom at 11:21 PM on Jan. 24, 2010
Answer by 29again at 11:58 PM on Jan. 24, 2010
Answer by 29again at 12:03 AM on Jan. 25, 2010
Answer by waldorfmom at 2:07 PM on Jan. 25, 2010
Next question overall
(Just for Fun)
Is menopause and getting older really all that terrifying?