I read about a week ago, that as many as 50% of post-abortive women questioned, stated they would NOT have had the abortion IF the father of the aborted baby had been more supportive. Whether it's true or not, I dunno. But it bothered me, that in this day and age a woman would be willing to abort for the sake of a lowlife's decisions to supportive or not. If the baby was lucky to be conceived by a good man it gets to survive, if conceived by a scumbag it's aborted. I just don't get the methodology of women's thinking here.
I actually find this question interesting. But then I also find it very sad when a man finds out his SO (whatever she may be) is preg with THEIR baby and SHE gets an abortion. We want equal rights but then deny this. And yes I DO know that SHE carries the baby and YES I DO know that there are crappy men that will want the baby for spite. But there are crappy women that KILL the baby for spite! Your question makes a good point, although I notice that many people seem to be ignoring it. In this day and age where women are demanding equal pay (as they should), equal rights (also a duh), its a sad commentary that they are willing to flush a LIFE because there is no man standing beside them.
Answer by momof030404 at 11:45 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 10:49 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 10:51 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
Answer by itsmesteph11 at 10:53 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
The ad doesn't have anything to do with having a scumbag for a father. The majority of women are still the primary care givers for children. It's a choice and not one that has to be understood for it to be a choice. I'll never understand why people fight so hard to get children born but then they bash PA users and don't lift a finger to the children that grow up in foster care or state homes that are never adopted.
Answer by legalmommy101 at 10:54 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 10:56 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
"Because it's more convenient for your narrow little worldview if you ASSume both groups are made up of the same people than it is for you to consider that there are pro-lifers who don't bash PA and pro-choice PA bashers. "
The majority here on cm seems to be the pro-life people that are PA bashers. The majority of politicians that are pro-life are also PA bashers. It seems to be a debate between the right to live and the quality of life.
Answer by legalmommy101 at 11:19 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 11:22 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
Answer by Yoshi_Yoshi at 11:35 AM on Feb. 4, 2010
Answer by tnmomofive at 11:47 AM on Feb. 4, 2010