What is the point of debating a "no win" scenario?
I'm talking about the abortion questions, the Hitler question, the what if you knew your kid would be a horrible murderer question and the latest, what if the scientist will die w/o the vegetative man's organs question.
What is the point of this type of debate other than to argue for argument's sake?
Asked by Anonymous at 6:34 PM on Feb. 22, 2010 in Religion & Beliefs
Answer by Anonymous at 6:36 PM on Feb. 22, 2010
Interesting star track reference:~) i don't know people like to argue, or start a conversation.
Answer by RyansMom001 at 6:52 PM on Feb. 22, 2010
Answer by Allergic2Stupid at 9:41 PM on Feb. 22, 2010
Sorry, but I just have to....It's not "star track", it's Star Trek (yes, I'm a Trekkie nerd...lol).
And to answer the OP, I don't know either, but ppl sure have a lot to say on those topics, don't they? If only they cared about the real world as much.
Answer by Anonymous at 9:52 PM on Feb. 22, 2010
Answer by roachiesmom at 1:52 AM on Feb. 23, 2010
LOL thank you for correcting me, I watch the show because my husband is likes it, he would be so disappointed in me.
Answer by RyansMom001 at 6:30 AM on Feb. 23, 2010
Answer by NotPanicking at 7:42 AM on Feb. 23, 2010
Answer by MamaK88 at 3:58 PM on Feb. 23, 2010
Answer by winterrose82 at 3:50 PM on Feb. 24, 2010
Next question overall
(Food & Drink)
A spin off of the hooters question....would you come to MY restaurant?
Check out some of the top posts today in Groups: