Judge Nina Gershon has ruled that congress acted unconstitutionally when they banned federal funding of Acorn.
What I want to know is why should Acorn have to be funded at all? This is tax dollars they are using, my money, your money. I don't think anyone or any group should automatically get federal funding. Just another reason lobbying and earmarks should be illegal.
Whats your take?
Answer by waldorfmom at 10:59 AM on Mar. 11, 2010
Answer by satire at 11:29 AM on Mar. 11, 2010
Answer by itsmesteph11 at 1:18 PM on Mar. 11, 2010
ACORN just needs to be forced out. It's not unconstitutional to not fund something. We have a Chicago thug as president. What else can you expect.
Answer by AngelDawn7 at 2:31 PM on Mar. 11, 2010
Check out some of the top posts today in Groups: