OP posted this previously: Because "we" haven't legally termed Mexican's as refugees??
Beachcomb replied with this: Yes cause we should just do that at will regardless any facts. So let's just check the definition of "Refugee" shall we?
"Under the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees from 1951, a refugee is a person who, owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of their nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail him/herself of the protection of that country."
***How exactly do Mexican citizens fall into this definition?? You do realize that you're basically insulting actual refugees when you suggest that right?***
How should I interpret her last sentence?? Edify me please.
Asked by Anonymous at 3:41 AM on Apr. 30, 2010 in Politics & Current Events
Answer by LoriKeet at 7:32 AM on Apr. 30, 2010
Sounds like you, OP have issues with the UN's definition of 'refugeee'..... And in case you didn't know Arizona Law = Federal Law. So if you take issue with the AZ law, then you might want to take that up with Congress.... This isn't Rocket Science, but it does require ones ability to read and comprehend.... GOOD LUCK! :o)
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 7:37 AM on Apr. 30, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 8:22 AM on Apr. 30, 2010
Answer by beachmamaof2 at 9:12 AM on Apr. 30, 2010
Here OP check this out please and you might be able to see some of the dilemma http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ
Answer by Anonymous at 9:12 AM on Apr. 30, 2010
Answer by mancosmomma at 9:49 AM on Apr. 30, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 10:07 AM on Apr. 30, 2010