All through the United States the states are basically saying they can not afford to run the states economy with out tax increases and/or cutting (police forces, fire deparments, teachers ect) I've yet to hear of any one suggesting cutting welfare. What gives? What happened to PA being a temporary programAnswer Question
Answer by Anonymous at 11:32 AM on May. 10, 2010
Answer by delilahsmom1177 at 11:34 AM on May. 10, 2010
Answer by ria7 at 11:34 AM on May. 10, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 11:36 AM on May. 10, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 11:38 AM on May. 10, 2010
Problem is I personally know people who have been on Pa way beyond the 5year limit. I live in Arizona and the illegal immigration only adds to the problem. To add insult to injury the people who are on Pa (that I know) are selling their FS for cash so they can buy drugs and alcohol. I work to support my son and we can't even qualify for the reduced lunch program. I'm all for helping those in need but come on people, its time to learn how to fish.
Answer by CKasting at 11:42 AM on May. 10, 2010
Answer by delilahsmom1177 at 11:43 AM on May. 10, 2010
Public Assistance = votes... It's all a game of politics. It will come down to a point where there is no one else’s pocket left to pick. No more $$ to borrow or print.. And once our government reaches a point where they can no longer take from others, people who have become dependent on government will get upset. Instead of picking themselves up and working harder as individuals, they will want more.. And just as liberals are doing today, they will make empty promises of providing more to the people without accountability on how to fund.. It's a political game played with taxpayers money. Apolitical game played with our childrens' future. It's disgusting.... At some point there will be no money left to play the game.
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 11:44 AM on May. 10, 2010
Answer by lovinangels at 11:45 AM on May. 10, 2010
Answer by ria7 at 11:46 AM on May. 10, 2010