He hasn’t read the Arizona immigration law, even though reading the law is the basic duty of any lawyer (let alone the U.S. Attorney General) who is called on to assess a legal situation.
Thus, he hasn’t got reasonable suspicion that Arizonans are violating the Constitution, even though reasonable suspicion is the basic investigative standard we expect law-enforcement to satisfy before officials harass Americans with stepped up scrutiny. …
If a police officer, without taking elementary investigative steps to inform himself about the facts of a situation, and thus without reasonable suspicion, simply assumed a person must be guilty of wrongdoing based on the police officer’s avowed prejudice, what would Eric Holder call it?
Do you agree? Hypocrite? Idiot? What names can you think of to best describe Obama's Attorney General?
Asked by Anonymous at 11:58 AM on May. 14, 2010 in Politics & Current Events
Answer by Anonymous at 12:00 PM on May. 14, 2010
Do you agree? YES
What names can you think of to best describe Obama's Attorney General? My momma said I shouldn't use that language. LOL!
Answer by Anonymous at 12:03 PM on May. 14, 2010
OP, your argument is extremely viable and logical.
It's a shame your use of four syllable words will confuse and befuddle those who need to comprehend this the most.
Answer by Anonymous at 12:05 PM on May. 14, 2010
Answer by Anonymous at 12:09 PM on May. 14, 2010
Answer by mancosmomma at 12:18 PM on May. 14, 2010
Answer by grlygrlz2 at 12:19 PM on May. 14, 2010
$10 says Wenona and her liberal peons avoid this question.
Sure glad I didn't take that bet. LOL "Can't excuse it, ignore it" is her policy.
Answer by Anonymous at 1:19 PM on May. 14, 2010
Answer by itsmesteph11 at 1:45 PM on May. 14, 2010
Answer by LoriKeet at 6:52 PM on May. 14, 2010