Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Net Neutrality

Which side of the network neutrality debate do you fall on; the telecoms or the FCC?

Answer Question

Asked by Anonymous at 10:56 AM on Jun. 22, 2010 in Politics & Current Events

Answers (5)
  • Net neutrality is a ridiculously horrible idea that only sounds good to people who aren't tech savvy enough to understand what it really means (a group that unfortunately includes the majority of politicians in the world)

    Answer by NotPanicking at 11:02 AM on Jun. 22, 2010

  • Agree with NotPanicking.

    Answer by rio_burb at 11:13 AM on Jun. 22, 2010

  • It's a bad idea to allow two users, each who pay for a subscribed level of access to the internet infrastructure to be able to connect to each other at the same level of access using whatever devices and software they wish?

    It is when the first user is using substandard equipment, making their downloading of the latest episode of Real Housewives of NY hold up your stock trade for a half hour while you wait for their packets to clear. A privately owned service has the right to restrict what equipment can be used to connect to it - no shoes, no shirt, no broadband, no service. Like I said, it only sounds good to those who don't understand it.

    Answer by NotPanicking at 11:36 AM on Jun. 22, 2010

  • I'm on the constitutions side. Net neutrality as they call it is nothing more than a power grab attached to a social program.

    Answer by itsmesteph11 at 12:17 PM on Jun. 22, 2010

  • I'm a supporter of Net Neutrality and EFF.   funny, NP, I'll have to tell my tech geek, pro-NN husband that he's not technically savvy.


    Answer by autodidact at 4:05 PM on Jun. 22, 2010

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.