Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

6 Bumps

As many as 1000 felons may have voted in the 2008 Minnesota election.

"a high degree of confidence that we had detected hundreds of
fraudulent votes cast by ineligible felons in Hennepin and Ramsey Counties."


Asked by grlygrlz2 at 12:32 PM on Jul. 16, 2010 in Politics & Current Events

Level 39 (106,530 Credits)
This question is closed.
Answers (24)
  • Oh, but we already got the message the other day when this was brought up. Apparently it's okay because the votes were heavily in favor of Franken. I think there was a word for this. We used to get deleted for using it (some of the members with a more delicate sensitivity would take it as a personal attack). I am pretty sure we all know what the word is, so I won't bother using it.


    Answer by QuinnMae at 1:31 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • You mean the Department of Justice headed by the same guy who wants to sue a state for enforcing federal law?! What a shock! (more sarcasm)

    Answer by LoriKeet at 12:50 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • Cue the chorus of "get over it, blah blah blah"

    Answer by lovinangels at 1:04 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • Lovin, more like "everybody does it, blah blah blah"

    Answer by mancosmomma at 1:18 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • surprised



    Answer by LoriKeet at 12:33 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • Imagine that

    Answer by tnmomofive at 12:49 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • OMG!! Like, I am sooooo surprised at this!!! NOT! When it takes 3 - 4 recounts to finally get the numbers you want, well, as they say, there's your sign, lol

    Answer by 29again at 12:58 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • I really enjoy having this issue barfed back up every few days.

    "Inconvenient truths" are not usually welcome. Not surprised you wish the issue would just go away.

    Answer by LoriKeet at 2:04 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • ~and I'm sure thats not the half of the corruption that took place in that election.

    Answer by itsmesteph11 at 1:49 PM on Jul. 16, 2010

  • But that's ok because someone was found not guilty of shoplifting in a MN court once, and that means everyone there has been exonerated of all charges for the rest of time. Or something like that. I forget the exact reason why this is ok, but that's about as much sense as it made.

    Answer by NotPanicking at 1:56 PM on Jul. 16, 2010