My surviving twin son was born at 24 weeks so he was in the hospital for 3 1/2 months. When he got out we were told that he would have to wait to be a year old and go under anesthesia to get him circumcised, after all that my son has been through I didn't want to put him through any more pain, one of my biggest concerns was that it also says in the bible that all males were cirumcised, I thought that if my son didn't get circumcised that he'd be denied from heaven, after talking to my pastor he said that although people did that for religious beliefs that God would not look down and judge my son by the extra skin on his penis but by his actions, his choices and weather he accepted Jesus Christ as his savior. After that we decided against it. Why did you chose to, or chose not to?
Answer by happy2bmom25 at 8:09 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
Answer by MomNbabyGirl009 at 4:38 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
Answer by bubsiclesmom at 4:44 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
For biblical and sanitary reasons, I had both my sons circumcised.
Answer by Ewadun at 5:04 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
Answer by older at 9:00 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
Answer by Katt709 at 9:33 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
Answer by Krysta622 at 10:00 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
All 3 of mine are not. My hubs was against it, and I agreed with him. I had read many articles on it and I really could not see a need to have it done. In fact the Pediatrician on call in the hospital told me I made a wise choice, he himself did not believe in it and he never had it done on his 4 children-- and they grew into adulthood with no problems.
Answer by MizLee at 11:05 AM on Jul. 18, 2010
Answer by willysmama at 11:18 AM on Jul. 18, 2010