Does it make them look better for finally getting around to doing something (which is why I think they stalled so long - they think it will), or does it make them look worse for letting him get away with it for so long (which is how I think it really looks)?Answer Question
Who cares about political ramifications?
He SHOULD be charged.....He should have BEEn charged
Although it was entertaining to watch him tangle with a reporter yesterday..he needs to step down, plead guilty and end it
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 3:27 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Answer by gertie41 at 3:28 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Answer by UpSheRises at 3:29 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
The 435 people up for re-election in the house in less than 4 months. Of course he should've been charged - but the point is he should've been charged a LONG time ago. They purposely stalled it until closer to the election. The question is, will it work?
I think thats a dummy move if that is what they were thinking...it just looks like they let another insider slide for longer.....This is a perfect example of the re-election whores..aka politicians...that's ALL they think about....his ass should have been charged about a YEAR ago...
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 3:32 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Answer by UpSheRises at 3:40 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Answer by Izsarejman at 3:45 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Ditto to Sweet. He's got a strong challenger in the primaries...I can't imagine he'll realistically make it much further than August. It's the same as all that Scooter Libby/Dick Chene bullshit. Normal people can clearly see that he's an asshat but his buddies want to see how it plays out.
LOL..I was thinking Ted Stevens! That FELON got a STANDING Ovation when he was FINALLY FORCED OUT...SICK
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 3:48 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Answer by jesse123456 at 4:49 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Answer by mancosmomma at 10:55 PM on Jul. 23, 2010
Check out some of the top posts today in Groups: