Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Did Adam and Eve have navels?



Asked by tasches at 2:51 PM on Aug. 3, 2010 in Religious Debate

Level 48 (298,202 Credits)
This question is closed.
Answers (18)
  • flatlanderjenn

    Answer by flatlanderjenn at 9:04 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • no, no navels

    Answer by fiatpax at 2:53 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • Although Im not uber religious... I would say no. Like PP said, they werent born so why have them? JMO tho :)

    Answer by My_3_Babies at 2:56 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • I don't know. As far as I know, there were no cameras. Ergo, no pictures!

    Answer by NannyB. at 2:56 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • I would say yes. If they didn't have them, then it would not be in our DNA to have them either.

    Answer by Maureen-MD at 2:56 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • Has nothing to do with DNA, navels are just the left over marks of where the umbilical cord was attached. Adam & Eve didn't have an umbilical cord, so there would be no reason they would have a navel. Also, since there were no other people to compare them to, they would not look unusual without them.

    Answer by ghostwriter777 at 3:06 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • Hmm..Im going to say yes.. people would look funny without belly buttons! lol

    Answer by SuperrMommyy at 2:54 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • I'd like to think not, they were not born from a womb but created from the dirt in the ground and Eve from the rib of Adam

    Answer by Shaneagle777 at 4:24 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • Does it matter?

    But I would say yes, they did. God created men after his own likeness.

    Answer by avpriddis at 6:25 PM on Aug. 3, 2010

  • From an evolutionary perspective, the first humans to evolve would have had navels since they originated from mammals.

    Answer by anng.atlanta at 10:34 PM on Aug. 3, 2010