Hypothetically if there were incontrovertable proof this was indeed a "victory mosque" could it be legally stopped or would it too be covered under the constitution?
I realize there is no such proof which is why I used the term "hypothetically". I'm curious if our constitution would protect our enemy under that circumstance. I don't know which is why I'm asking.
Answer by ladykyr at 1:59 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
Answer by UpSheRises at 2:04 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
Answer by NotPanicking at 1:51 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
Answer by stacymomof2 at 2:43 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
The definition I have of a "victory mosque" is one built at a sight of a triumph. Anyone who believes that deliberately targeting and murdering 3000 civilians is a victory, is definitely my enemy.
al qaeda isn't building this mosque.
Answer by autodidact at 3:07 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
Answer by hot-mama86 at 2:01 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
The KKK is alive and well today despite its bloody and disgusting history. They still spread hate and routinely stage "parades" in minority neighborhoods...
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 2:06 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
Answer by LovingSAHMommy at 3:34 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
Answer by kimberlyinberea at 1:48 PM on Aug. 26, 2010
Answer by urkiddingright at 1:52 PM on Aug. 26, 2010