Ben Stein or Richard Dawkins?
see link below
Obby I don't take Stein seriously he is trying to be dead pan funny, which gets old really fast. Dawkins isn't putting forth any new scientific evidence this is his opinion but I don't see how this supports or disproves a belief in God. It doesn't do either. You can't prove God scientifically, and you can't disprove him either. There is nothing new to support his belief, so it shouldn't be taken as scientific fact anymore then Creationism should be taken as scientific fact.
Answer by RyansMom001 at 1:52 PM on Sep. 2, 2010
Ben Stein, because the other guy doesn't seem very comfortable with his own argument. All this doesn't matter people should believe what they believe.
Answer by RyansMom001 at 11:49 AM on Sep. 2, 2010
I don't agree with creationism but I don't really care for Dawkins sometimes, I think he is too harsh.
Answer by Nsbgirl at 12:21 PM on Sep. 2, 2010
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 11:22 AM on Sep. 2, 2010
Answer by ObbyDobbie at 11:22 AM on Sep. 2, 2010
Dawkins response to Stein
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 11:24 AM on Sep. 2, 2010
Answer by witchqueen at 11:59 AM on Sep. 2, 2010
Answer by RyansMom001 at 1:53 PM on Sep. 2, 2010
Answer by sweet-a-kins at 11:26 AM on Sep. 2, 2010