That by him not paying and everyone still expecting the firemen to show up...that it is like saying that your employer refuses to pay you at all even with letters and warnings. But, then you still show up to work everyday.
uh, no...I will NOT show up anymore..even if the business is failing. ( As in, you don't pay me for my services, I am not showing up to put out your fire)
Answer by urkiddingright at 9:38 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by JuLiAnSmOmMy317 at 1:01 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by autodidact at 12:23 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by dullscissors at 12:36 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by sopranomommy at 2:03 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by urkiddingright at 3:15 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by kiansmom0423 at 12:06 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by brandyj at 12:23 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
I think the whole way the operate that system is stupid. And no, that man's home should not have just been let to burn. He offered payment. He made a mistake in forgetting, he didn't blatantly NOT pay. They let his animals die. How could humans be so cruel and down low? And how could anyone who's supposed to be human be so cruel and agree with the fire dept.? There were ways to work that situation out, and they let it go too far. Shame on anyone agreeing with the fire dept.
YOU are forgetting that the HOMEOWNER let his animals die. He had 2 hours BEFORE the fire reached his home to get them out!
Answer by tiddliwinks at 3:32 PM on Oct. 8, 2010
Answer by annabellelee at 2:23 PM on Oct. 8, 2010