Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

1 Bump

Supreme Court Weighs Whether Vaccine Makers Can Be Sued

What do you think?
Should Vaccine Companies be shielded from Law Suits sprouting from injuries or deaths caused by vaccines?

We don't protect other drug companies, why should we protect Vaccine makers? Shouldn't each case have the right to be heard in a regular case rather than simply "paid off" by the "vaccine courts"?

Answer Question
 
SabrinaMBowen

Asked by SabrinaMBowen at 5:52 PM on Oct. 16, 2010 in Parenting Debate

Level 40 (122,988 Credits)
Answers (16)
  • Here's the PBS News Hour video about the case...


    Click Here To Watch

    SabrinaMBowen

    Comment by SabrinaMBowen (original poster) at 5:53 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • Even though Flu vaccines are not required by law yet, other vaccines are. Yes they should be held accountable especially the law enforced ones, such as for our children.
    lacyjones

    Answer by lacyjones at 5:56 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • Vaccines aren't required by law. That said neither are other medications or OTC pills. But I can guarantee you if a child were to die from taking Tylenol the company would be sued, or the parents would if nothing else have the option to sue... I don't see why any other drug, including vaccines, should be any different... IF your company creates a product which harms a person, you are liable, and should be held accountable.
    SabrinaMBowen

    Comment by SabrinaMBowen (original poster) at 6:03 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • No way should they allowed to slide if their product is causing harm. Vaccines are just another drug and should be treated as such.
    scout_mom

    Answer by scout_mom at 6:13 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • vaccines are not required by law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and yes we should b allowed to sue!! imo i think they cause more harm than good and less people would get them if they knew the real facts!
    Caroline2010

    Answer by Caroline2010 at 7:57 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • actually many vaccines ARE required if you want your child to attend school. if you homeschool it does not matter but in most situations that is not the case. I hate the fact that is now REQUIRED that your child have the Chicken Pox vaccine before going to K. Really?? I had it twice and was fine...
    coolchic320

    Answer by coolchic320 at 8:41 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • coolchic - EVERY SINGLE STATE has exemptions and allows children to attend public school without vaccines. NO VACCINE is required - NONE!

    That however, is not the point here, or the question... The question posed here is simply SHOULD those injured or the families of those injured or killed have the right to file a law suit against the drug companies which produce the vaccines as they are with other drugs?
    SabrinaMBowen

    Comment by SabrinaMBowen (original poster) at 8:46 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • well in CT the exemptions are medical and religion and they have to be backed very well...but as for the question for sure they should have the right..i find it absurd that they could be exept is absurd...it makes no sense
    coolchic320

    Answer by coolchic320 at 8:52 PM on Oct. 16, 2010

  • Possibly...but I don't believe that vaccinations ARE harmful.
    kerp1960

    Answer by kerp1960 at 12:23 AM on Oct. 17, 2010

  • Well, that's the thing isn't it...

    If vaccines aren't harmful then there is no need for our government to protect the companies from lawsuits, is there? So, the entire idea of them stepping in and buying off the families and victims through "vaccine court" shouldn't ever have been brought up, let alone signed in to law...
    SabrinaMBowen

    Comment by SabrinaMBowen (original poster) at 12:28 AM on Oct. 17, 2010

Join CafeMom now to contribute your answer and become part of our community. It's free and takes just a minute.